A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Too Much, Too Soon

no more orchids lc 2 small

We should soon be seeing the results of the British Film Institute’s major fund (and publicity) raising drive to restore the nine surviving silent films directed by Alfred Hitchcock. If the quality of Criterion’s new release of the 1934 “The Man Who Knew Too Much” is any indication, we should be in for some major revelations. A film that spent many years in the public domain, subjected to all kinds of mistreatment by budget DVD labels, “The Man Who Knew Too Much” now looks far less like a battered relic and more like the movie Hitchcock actually made. One of several films in which Hitchcock examined the inner workings of a marriage — with infinitely more insight and honesty than Sacha Gervasi’s deplorable Oscar bid, “Hitchcock” — it was also Hitchcock’s first venture into the international intrigue genre, a form he would perfect with “The 39 Steps” a year later. Most conspicuously, it is the only film of his that Hitchcock felt moved to remake, and the 1956 version with Doris Day and James Stewart does indeed correct some of the structural flaws of the 1934 film while considerably advancing its analysis of the couple.

I lay out of few lines of comparison in my column this week for the New York Times, which also includes a look at one of my favorite actress’s slow progress toward stardom as reflected in “Carole Lombard: In the Thirties,” a new three film set from the Turner Classic Movies Vault Collection that includes Walter Lang’s “No More Orchids” (1932) and two films by the forgotten David Burton, “Brief Moment” (1933) and “Lady by Choice” (1934).

51 comments to Too Much, Too Soon

  • Alex

    Not too much should be made of MWKTMII’s character as a “remake” of MWKTMI in comparing the former and the latter. MWKTMI is made more succinct by its use of the narrative scheme reprised in MWKTMII in part because the former was made in an era of 75-95 minute features as opposed to the ampler time available to a 1950s film in VistaVision Color (and the like) enhanced by the big-screen-and-color-quasi-spectacle alternative to the TV competition. MWKTMI has a different editing style simply because of the pressure of early (e.g., Pre-Kodak XXX and wide- lens camera) for more close ups and, thus, cuts. (This is so apart from any contrary tendency toward certain sources of rapid, enhanced cutting in Hitchcock’s – from stalking Scottie tracking POV to Carlotta/Madeleine Elster / Judy Barton;from Mark to Marnie hand during the thunderstorm in MARNIE increase tendency toward rapid cuts to close ups. And it’s true of evolution in Hitchcock’s style during Color –and almost conterminously – Burks-shot cinematographic style.) Content-wise the social, cultural and thematic connotations of Bob, Jill and Betty Lawrence are miles apart from those of Ben, Josephine and Hank McKenna.

    Same script? Pretty much. Same director? Kinda. Same production system? Not so much.